| Route 2/32/82, Norwich
Interesting grade-separated intersection with routes 32 and 82 in Norwich. Route 2's profile:
|
Route 2 follows the path of two 19th-century turnpikes: the Hartford and New London, dating from 1800, and the Colchester and Norwich, dating from 1805. These turnpikes collected tolls for about 50 years. | |
In the early 1900s, the state started taking over maintenance of major roads, and marked the Route 2 corridor with colored bands on poles: blue between East Hartford and Glastonbury, and yellow from there to Stonington. In March 1920, Connecticut awarded a $1.4 million contract to pave a 32-mile highway between Hartford and New London by way of Glastonbury and Colchester. The 18-foot wide concrete road eventually became parts of Route 2 and 85. In 1922, what would later be Route 2 became part of NE-17, a 120-mile New England interstate route entering at North Canaan and ending at Stonington. There was also an NE-2 at the time, which was renumbered US 5 in 1926. In 1932, NE-17 was decommissioned and Route 2 was born. Early RealignmentsIn the 1930s, Route 2 followed Main Street directly into the North Stonington town center. By 1943, a 2-lane bypass to the south had been built. Today, it looks like a natural part of the highway. The western end of this bypass meets Main Street where Mystic Road (old Route 119) also intersects. East Hartford - Glastonbury Expressway
Expressway plansIn the 1950s, shore traffic was turning Route 2 into a parking lot; before all parts of the Route 2 expressway were open, backups of 12 miles were not unknown. In the mid-1950s, plans were in motion for a new expressway extending from Glastonbury to New London. The highway would also pass through Marlborough, Colchester, Salem, Montville, and Waterford, paralleling routes 2 and 85 in those towns. In December 1958 a detailed improvement proposal was presented to the state, and Route 2 to Colchester was constructed with only a few variations from the plan. The existing EHG would be widened to six lanes between the planned Interstate 491 interchange (now Route 3) and House Street; at that point, a new Route 2 expressway would branch off to the southeast, just as it does today. After leaving the EHG, the new expressway would widen its profile to 100 feet between roadway center lines, with separate vertical alignments as needed to follow the hilly terrain. At the "elbow" south of Neipsic Road where Route 2 turns south, provision would be made for an interchange with relocated Route 83. (The report doesn't say whether the new 83 would be an expressway as well). The planned Route 2 would connect with the recently (late 1950s) constructed two-lane section in the Ten Curves area near the Glastonbury - Marlborough border. New eastbound lanes would be built, while the existing two-way road would be converted to westbound lanes. In Marlborough is where the built Route 2 differed the most from the planned. The 1958 plan called for raising the westbound roadway above Route 66 and Johnson Road, while running the eastbound lanes below. The report claimed this treatment would be less expensive and allow better ramp design at Route 66 (then called US 6A). The built Route 2 underpasses both roads in both directions. In Colchester, work was underway in 1958 on a new two-lane section of Route 2. The new expressway would again get new eastbound lanes while using the two-lane section for westbound travel. East of Route 16, the expressway would turn south (along today's Route 11) toward New London. Provision for a relocated Route 2 expressway to Norwich (to be built later) was included at Colchester. In 1963, the state articulated plans for extending Route 2 beyond Norwich to the the shoreline at Stonington. More plans in ColchesterThe partial interchange at Route 11 was conceived in the early 1960s as a complete interchange, with only the left exit from Route 2 westbound deferred until traffic increased. In a 1960 local public hearing, the highway department said it expected to start construction on Route 2 in summer 1962, with most of Colchester's Route 2 open to traffic in 1964. Building Route 2In the late 1950s and 1960s, Route 2 was upgraded to a freeway in stages. "Super 2" sections of two-lane undivided road (but controlled access) were built between East Glastonbury and Marlborough, and Marlborough and Colchester. ("Super 2" is a nickname for any road built that way -- not an honorific for Route 2.) The westbound lanes in Colchester are older than the eastbound lands. These segments bypassed hazardous conditions on the old Route 2, and were built with an expansion to four lanes in mind: the primary limitation was funding. Opening dates (some approximate) from west to east:
"Loop 2"In the early to mid 1970s, I remember North Main Street in Marlborough marked in a few locations (e.g. Park Road) as "Loop 2". This didn't last long and is not present today. However, the incomplete interchange at Exit 12 prevented motorists from combining Loop 2 and the Route 2 expressway into an actual loop. Plans East of NorwichRoute 2 proposal, Norwich, 1972
Proposed Route 2 expressway in Norwich, shown in 1972 official state highway map In 1969, Route 2 was proposed to continue east from its terminus at Route 169, then gradually veer southeast toward Stonington. The 1972 state map shows a different plan (see figure): Route 2 would loop around Norwich to the west, starting east of I-395 and rejoin the existing Route 2 south of the city. In 1967, a public hearing was held in Stonington for the relocation of Route 2 from I-95 to the state line. Between then and 1970, the state renumbered this proposal to Route 78, which was partially completed in 1979. Improving Route 2In 1975, the state's Suggested Improvements Program included a major widening of Route 2 from Main Street (exit 5A) to Route 94 (exit 8), echoing what was proposed in 1958 but never completed. The total cost was $6.6 million, and most of the work was projected to start after 1978. This was never done, but the opening of the Route 3 interchange led to the construction of auxiliary lanes (circa 1990) between Routes 3 and 17, making Route 2 six lanes in that area. The 1975 program also called for revamping the outdated interchange and at-grade crossing at Fitchville; this was completed in July 2001. September 1, 1987 saw the opening of the long-awaited interchange with Route 3 in Glastonbury. On Feb. 23, 1994, the on-ramp to westbound I-84 was shifted from a left entrance to a right entrance, on the Bulkeley Bridge approach. Until July 2001, the interchange area at Route 32 at Fitchville, dating back to 1961, remained substandard, with thru traffic narrowing to single lanes, and an at-grade crossing with Yantic Lane. The state undertook a $25 million project to rebuild the interchange, removing the at-grade crossing, widening Route 2 to four lanes throughout, and moving the southbound 32 ramp to fly over and merge with Route 2 eastbound from the right. No direct ramp was provided from Route 2 east to Route 32 north. On July 4, 2001 (a good month for the highway), the project to widen Route 2 to four lanes between I-95 and Route 78 was completed. This was done to relieve congestion between those two highways, in place of an abandoned plan to connect 95 and 78 directly. | |
Drive the old Route 2For "secret route" mavens the SR numbers are included for any state-maintained but unsignposted routes. Be aware that there won't be signs with these numbers. These directions take you eastbound, from East Hartford to Stonington. Most of the former Route 2 between East Hartford and Norwich survives as local streets. Start southbound on Main Street (SR 517) in East Hartford at Silver Lane; continue into Glastonbury to Hebron Avenue. The three-way intersection there was formerly four-way, with the New London Turnpike leaving southeast through what is now a town green. Instead of tearing up the grass, turn left on Hebron Avenue, then right on the rerouted New London Turnpike. You'll pass under Route 17, where Route 2 used to join the Turnpike between 1953 and 1964. In East Glastonbury, New London Turnpike (old SR 582) dead-ends where the freeway bisects the road; you'll need to cross on Wassuc Road and rejoin old Route 2 on Tollgate Road (old SR 582A). Where Tollgate dead ends, you can see the original aligment and some fragments of pavement. However, this area is closed to the public for a rifle range. Backtrack to the Route 2 entrance on Wassuc Road; there's no other way to continue into Marlborough. Get off at Exit 12, and continue straight on Main Street (old SR 583), formerly known as the New London Turnpike. From this point, Old Route 2 continues without interruptions to Bozrah. You'll pass through the center of Marlborough, cut through a corner of Hebron, and enter Colchester. After a junction with Route 2, the old Route 2 becomes Hartford Road (SR 615), then soon merges with Route 85 south as you approach the town center. About a mile south of Route 16, turn left onto Norwich Avenue (SR 616), as Route 2 used to. This eventually becomes Fitchville Road (SR 608) as you approach Norwich. At Fitchville, the Route 2 expressway blocks your way, so you'll need to get on it temporarily and exit at Route 32. Turn left; this road becomes West Town Street (SR 642), taking you into Norwichtown, and ending at the Route 2/32/169 intersection. Route 2 continues as a surface road through Norwich to US 1 in Stonington. There are two old alignments I know of: one is Milltown Road, a short street paralleling Route 2 to the north, 0.2 mile after crossing from Ledyard into North Stonington. In the 1978 highway log, this street is called "Old Rt. 2". The other is Main Street in North Stonington, which Route 2 followed until a bypass was built slightly south around 1940. | |
Casino trafficTwo of the world's three largest casinos opened in southeastern Connecticut in the 1990s: Foxwoods in Ledyard and Mohegan Sun in Montville. Area traffic is exceeding the capacity of two-lane highways such as routes 2 and 164. For several years, the state has planned transportation and transit improvements in the area. A study floated circa 1994 considered installing toll booths on Routes 2 and 2A to finance improvements, but this appears to have run aground. The Pequots are paying for some planned improvements to Route 2, including widening to four lanes between Routes 164 and 214 (about $15 million). Smaller projects falling out from casino traffic include improvements to the Route 117/214 intersection in Ledyard. In 1996, a fast-track upgrade to Route 2A was done: widening the "Super 2" road to four lanes and adding an interchange for the Mohegan Sun casino. In 1997, ConnDot retained Vanasse Hangen Brustlin to study the growing traffic in the area. VHB recommended the following alternatives for further study:
Route 2/2A/32 TIPIn April 1999, the state issued the Route 2/2A/32 Transportation Improvement Study. The several alternatives shown include four-lane limited-access bypasses for Route 2A and Route 2, but they're not freeways and may not have any access between their endpoints. I'll describe three alternatives in detail. Alternative A: Do NothingAlternative A, No-Action, assumes no further construction by ConnDOT aside from what has already been approved in the area. These actions are:
Alternative E: 2A bypass, 4 lane Route 2Alternative E includes a bypass of Route 2A from Route 12 to Route 2 in Preston. The plan would also widen the Mohegan-Pequot bridge and approaches to four lanes, making Route 2A four lanes wide for its entire length. Route 2 would also be widened to four lanes from Route 2A to I-95. The Route 2A Bypass would be a new 2.3 mile, 4-lane roadway: 88 feet wide, with 10-foot shoulders, 12-foot lanes, and a 16-foot grassed median. The bypass would have no intersections or interchanges between its endpoints at Routes 12 and 2. There would be overpasses at the original Route 2A, Harris Fuller Road, and Middle Road. Route 2 would also be widened to four lanes with a 16-foot median, but with at-grade intersections with local streets. The Route 2/184 rotary would be redesigned as a conventional signalized intersection. Alternative E would cost about $94 million. Alternative F: 2A bypass, Route 2 bypassAlternative F includes everything in alternative E but adds a Route 2 bypass from Route 214 to I-95, instead of widening the existing Route 2 there. Like the Route 2A bypass, this 4-lane road would have no intersections or interchanges -- just grade separations. The 6.8-mile bypass would end at the Route 2 about 1,300 feet north of I-95. It would cross Wintechog Road, Route 201, Jeremy Hill Road, Route 184, Stony Brook Road, and North Anguilla Road at the gas pipeline. The Route 2 bypass option was apparently discarded in 1999. Alternative F would cost about $131 million. The advisory group recommends...In March 2001, members of the Route 2/2A Advisory Committee announced its recommendations to residents in Preston. A summary:
The 2001 Mashantucket proposalThe Mashantucket Pequot Indians, operators of the Foxwoods casino in Ledyard, proposed in August 2001 modifications to a one-mile stretch of Route 2 adjoining the casino. The proposal, which was not described in detail, includes "slightly relocating a portion of Route 2, building a cloverleaf and highway overpasses, adding a frontage road and creating four traffic roundabouts." The state traffic commission has asked for more detailed drawings before the tribe makes a formal proposal. State approval would be needed for any modifications to Route 2. Officials from neighboring towns were perturbed at the secrecy surrounding the plan, which had been in the works for months. The tribe declined to comment further on the plan, saying it was one of several options they were considering for Route 2. The Mashantuckets had previously pledged $7.5 million of road improvements: certainly of a smaller scale than the relocation plan. The 2003 Mashantucket proposalIn April 2003, the Mashantucket Pequots announced a $100 million-plus plan to upgrade Foxwoods and Route 2. An elevated 1.8-mile bypass, two or four lanes wide, would be created on tribal-owned land, from the Preston town line into North Stonington, where the tribe is building two golf courses. Visitors would access the casino via frontage roads and a flyover from Route 2. The existing Route 2 would be converted to an internal road. The plan has not received state approval; though the DOT in May 2003 was said to want the road to continue to Route 164. Rerouting explored in NorwichBetween the end of the freeway at Route 169 and relatively open country in Preston, Route 2 passes through downtown Norwich, with a number of one-way streets, intersections and turns in the mainline. Norwich is planning a revitalization (the "Rose City Renaissance"), and in concert with that would like to unsnarl traffic and improve access to downtown. In March 2004, the city manager started a dialogue with ConnDOT about how to improve the Route 2 experience in Norwich. The early 1970s freeway proposal is not an option, but the following options were brought up as worthwhile to study:
| |
| |
Exit Madness Route 2 exit numbering has some anomalies. In East Hartford, eastbound drivers encounter exits 5, 5A, 5B, 5C, and 5D, all unrelated; and Marlborough has a missing exit 14 with absolutely nothing meriting an interchange between exit 13 (Route 66) and South Main St (exit 15). One possible explanation: it was reserved for the Route 66 freeway, a perennial "future needs" plan between Meriden and Willimantic but never brought about. Given the town hall, kindergarten, and Lake Terramuggus north of the existing Route 66, it seems reasonable that a freeway would have been routed south. For a detailed discussion of exits on all Connecticut freeways, see Exits. | |
|