![]() These icons ( ![]() True There is a school district in Iowa called Interstate 35. (from Ryan Tucker) |
I-135 Kansas (link)95.74 miles [1 Before 1980, this road was marked I-35W. Construction started in the early 1960s, and Interstate 135 finished about 10 years later. See also:
I-235 Iowa (link)13.78 miles [1 An early (1957-58) Iowa numbering plan had the numbers I-235 and I-380
overlapping along the entire route, perhaps to be fair to both I-35 and
I-80. On Nov. 10, 1958, AASHO directed Iowa to remove the I-380 overlap,
while approving most of the remaining system. [13 The idea for this freeway seems to have arisen in the 1950s. In 1957, the
Des Moines City Council unanimously approved the freeway plan, and
construction began shortly. The first segment of I-235 opened Dec. 14, 1961;
the last segment opened Oct. 30, 1968, four years ahead of the
original schedule. [12 See also:
I-235 Kansas (link)16.52 miles [1
I-235 Oklahoma (link)5.36 miles [1 See also:
I-335 Kansas (link)50.13 miles [1 On Oct. 25, 1956, this road opened as part of the Kansas Turnpike, but
without a route number. [14 On Oct. 23, 1987, I-335 was designated here. [3 See also:
I-335 (cancelled) Minnesota (link)2.74 miles [2 Proposed in 1964, I-335 was killed around 1975 due to neighborhood resistance, as well as MNDot predictions that the route would actually increase congestion in the I-94 Lowry Hill tunnel. A political action committee in the St Anthony East neighborhood,
hearing of the planned elevated freeway, first requested that it be
placed underground. When the highway department declined this proposal,
the PAC moved on to opposing the freeway outright. [10 It got as far as right-of-way acquisition, and some Evel Knievel ramps
are visible on I-35W between Hennepin Avenue and Johnston St. After the
highway was cancelled, the land was repopulated, with a swath of new
homes going through an otherwise much older neighborhood. I-335 was
withdrawn in early 1978, and funding was transferred to I-394 and
other local projects. [4 See also:
I-435 Kansas; Missouri (link)80.81 miles [1 See also:
I-535 Minnesota; Wisconsin (link)2.78 miles [1 Interstate 535 crosses over the 7.975-foot John A. Blatnik Bridge, which was
dedicated on December 2, 1961, and got its current name on September 24,
1971. [11
I-635 Kansas; Missouri (link)12.67 miles [1
I-635 Texas (link)
![]() Currently (2005) Interstate 635 is also noted for the Dallas High-Five interchange, under construction at US 75. The underpowered modified cloverleaf is being replaced with a four-level stack. The frontage roads, formerly severed by the interchange, will be connected through, creating the fifth level. It should be complete in 2006. DesignationOn Oct. 1, 1959, the Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) approved I-635 at
a location leading from I-35W south of Dallas looping eastward to end
at I-35 north of Dallas. [15 In December 1971, Interstate 20 was relocated to the south in Forth Worth
and Dallas (it used to follow I-30 here). The southernmost 13 miles of I-635
were transferred to I-20. [15 In the summer of 1974, I-635 was legislatively extended approximately 9.6
miles westward from I-35W to TX 121. [15 Expanding I-635To increase capacity on I-635 between US 75 and I-35E, planners in 1999 were looking at a novel solution: six additional HOV lanes placed in underground tunnels. Erik Slotboom wrote: "At a meeting Tuesday night, the status of the I635 study was presented. The locally preferred alternative for the segment between I35E north and US75 is the addition of 6 HOT lanes to the existing 8 lane freeway. Local opposition made it necessary to add the lanes without procuring any right-of-way. In the center section around the North Dallas Tollway, the two options under consideration are cut-and-cover tunnels beneath the feeder roads and twin bored tunnels, 2.5 miles long. "The twin bored tunnels would be 17 meters below ground and would have 3 lanes with 10 ft and 4 ft shoulders. Overall width at the base is about 60 feet. Estimated price is $200 million - about $140 million more than the cut-and-cover option. Still, for 5 miles of a big tunnel, this is not too bad. Building the HOT lanes underneath the feeders would be a nightmare, especially considering the heavy commercialization along the corridor. As far as I know, this would be the first bored tunnels in the US built
for traffic diversion only (not for mountains or waterways).
Don't look for this to get built anytime soon. In my opinion, it will
be at least 10 years before construction starts, whatever the selected
option is." [8 See also:
Sources
|